When you work in software development, you wind up in a lot of debates about front end and backend coding and which one folks prefer. As programming has matured as an industry, the discipline has fractured into specializations involving where applications do their work. Client-side storage vs. server-side storage coding is a prime example of the sort of debates that continue in programmerland. Where you place your code can have all sorts of impacts on the end product.
We’ve got you covered, so don’t even trip, dog. Our trusty guide is here to help you through the minefield of front- and backend storage coding and give you an idea of when and why you’ll use them. We give you the top features of both types of coding, and you’ll also learn about a hybrid approach that you can use to resolve some of the issues presented by either method.
Server-Side and Client-Side: Key Features
You should think of client- and server-side coding as situation-dependent. You’ll need to know when to apply each one to produce successful applications. Server-side coding uses frameworks like ASP.NET and languages like VB.NET and C#, and it requires calls and connections to remote objects, including servers (duh). You’ll want to use server-side scripting whenever you need your client to access permanent remote storage like files or databases. On the downside, server-side scripts tend to have high overhead and resource requirements and slow down your app.
Like server-side coding, client-side coding uses frameworks like ASP.NET. Client-side scripts can be in a variety of languages like C#, too. You’ll want to use client-side scripting when you don’t need additional connections. Developers embed client-side code into web pages and applications, which makes them more responsive and less resource-intensive. The major issue with client-side apps is that the scripting requires extra time, and the end-user browser needs to support the same language you used.
Meet Ajax
Both backend and front end developers make bank, but full stack developers, who work in all areas, tend to make more than either of them. Similarly, there’s a compromise approach that combines client-side and server-side coding and does better than either one. Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, or Ajax, takes the best of client- and server-side programming to make something new and more powerful.
The beauty of Ajax is how responsive it is. When you use a page with Ajax scripting, it won’t have to refresh the page to receive or provide information from or to the server. Ajax allows for instant communication between client and server without locking the client until it gets a response. That makes it ideal for all kinds of applications, including instant polls, email suggestions, and autofill fields.
And there you go kiddos. Knowing which type of scripting to use in a client–server situation is vital to your success as a developer. Our guide is here to help you learn the differences between client-side storage vs. server-side storage coding. We show you when to use each type of coding, and we teach you about a combined approach that can sometimes beat either option and get your apps humming away.
About us: Career Karma is a platform designed to help job seekers find, research, and connect with job training programs to advance their careers. Learn about the CK publication.
